Engagement

Decision Governance Group operates through structured, selective engagements designed to evaluate AI-mediated decision systems under real conditions.

Engagement Terms

Scope is defined upfront.

Work remains attributable to Decision Governance Group unless explicitly transferred.

No derivative reuse without agreement.

⸻

Where Engagement Begins

Engagements typically start when one of the following is true:

• a system is making or influencing consequential decisions

• authority boundaries are unclear or untested

• decisions may be subject to regulatory, legal, or board-level scrutiny

⸻

Engagement Types

1. Live Pressure Test

90–120 minute working session on a live system or active scenario.

Focus:

• decision authority at execution

• failure modes under stress

• governance gaps that emerge in real time

No artifact produced.

Used to determine whether deeper review is warranted.

⸻

2. Internal Review Memo

Confidential written evaluation of a defined decision system.

Includes:

• authority mapping at execution

• replayability assessment

• identified failure modes

• governance risk exposure

For internal use.

⸻

3. Independent Governance Review (IDGR)

Full structured evaluation of control-plane integrity.

Covers:

• decision surface clarity

• authority and ownership at execution

• replayability and lineage under scrutiny

• governance capacity relative to system behavior

Delivered as a board-level findings report.

⸻

Engagement Model

Engagements are selective and based on the relevance and consequence of the system under review.

This is not implementation work.

This is independent evaluation of decision authority at execution.